Is the LC9s discontinued - Page 2 - Ruger Forum

Ruger Forum

Is the LC9s discontinued

This is a discussion on Is the LC9s discontinued within the Ruger Pistols forums, part of the Pistol & Revolver Forum category; I spoke with a Ruger factory rep. today & was told that the LC9s is not out of production. He said they've halted production temporarily ...


Go Back   Ruger Forum > Pistol & Revolver Forum > Ruger Pistols

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes

Old May 15th, 2018, 11:28 AM   #16
 
luvmysr9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: East TN
Posts: 1,984
luvmysr9 has a spectacular aura aboutluvmysr9 has a spectacular aura about
I spoke with a Ruger factory rep. today & was told that the LC9s is not out of production. He said they've halted production temporarily & will start making them again soon including the stainless slide model. He said he couldn't give me any info on the possibility of a newer version, though.



luvmysr9 is offline  
Advertisements
Old May 15th, 2018, 03:14 PM   #17
vba
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 71
vba is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by davevabch View Post
If you shoot the LC9S frequently and a lot of ammo down range, and you like the gun, then I might make a suggestion. Buy a second one Now. One for range and one for Carry. They are still available and the Prices are GREAT! Just a thought.
Great minds think alike! Bought a second LC9s a couple of weeks ago, paid $292 plus tax.

I really like my LC9s and carry it more than all of my other guns.
vba is offline  
Old May 27th, 2018, 04:36 PM   #18
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Galivants Ferry, SC
Posts: 9
IPSC is on a distinguished road
I don't get the fact that people here don't understand the significant step-change brought about by the P365.

In summary...it's a Glock 43-size ( LC9S size, if you prefer) gun.....that holds 10-11 rounds like the considerably THICKER and CHUNKIER Glock 26.

Imagine for a moment you are a Glock fan....and you can get Glock 26 round count in a very small and very thin gun like a model 43. Game Changer. My prediction is that every competing manufacturer, Ruger included.....will HAVE to make small, SLIM 10 rd, 9mm's.....in order to compete.

Even the Shield is TOO TALL....and we all know for EDC, barrel length is not the BIG factor, but gun HEIGHT can be, so it won't print when using in a IWB holster.

Personally, I like the LC9s. It's claim to fame besides being properly small for an EDC gun, is its terrific trigger among striker fired guns. I hope LC9s production resumes, as has been hinted here, but if Ruger is instead phasing it out, let's hope that the replacement they give us... is a proper P365 clone, without the SIG QC worries. If not that, then at leas again another 7-8 rd gun, but with 1.) a take-down method more like other guns without a loose pin...and 2.) giving us 2 mags like everyone else.

.
IPSC is offline  
 
Old May 27th, 2018, 05:11 PM   #19
 
luvmysr9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: East TN
Posts: 1,984
luvmysr9 has a spectacular aura aboutluvmysr9 has a spectacular aura about
Quote:
Originally Posted by IPSC View Post
I don't get the fact that people here don't understand the significant step-change brought about by the P365.

In summary...it's a Glock 43-size ( LC9S size, if you prefer) gun.....that holds 10-11 rounds like the considerably THICKER and CHUNKIER Glock 26.

Imagine for a moment you are a Glock fan....and you can get Glock 26 round count in a very small and very thin gun like a model 43. Game Changer. My prediction is that every competing manufacturer, Ruger included.....will HAVE to make small, SLIM 10 rd, 9mm's.....in order to compete.

Even the Shield is TOO TALL....and we all know for EDC, barrel length is not the BIG factor, but gun HEIGHT can be, so it won't print when using in a IWB holster.

Personally, I like the LC9s. It's claim to fame besides being properly small for an EDC gun, is its terrific trigger among striker fired guns. I hope LC9s production resumes, as has been hinted here, but if Ruger is instead phasing it out, let's hope that the replacement they give us... is a proper P365 clone, without the SIG QC worries. If not that, then at leas again another 7-8 rd gun, but with 1.) a take-down method more like other guns without a loose pin...and 2.) giving us 2 mags like everyone else.

.
There may be some people like me that are waiting to see how the P365 performs after the recall on it. I'm very interested in the P365 too, but am waiting to see if SIG hashed out all the problems it had when it was first released.
luvmysr9 is offline  
Old May 27th, 2018, 05:15 PM   #20
 
petergunn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: ohio
Posts: 500
petergunn is on a distinguished road
The new Sig is the latest thing for the herd to stampede to but the kel-tec p-11 is a double stack 9 thatís been out for quite awhile, not the coolness of a Sig but it is small and light and cheaper than Ruger.

The issue I have with the LC9s is its too big to pocket carry and same capacity as an LCP so why ? Especially with the LCPII available.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
petergunn is offline  
Old May 27th, 2018, 05:51 PM   #21
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Galivants Ferry, SC
Posts: 9
IPSC is on a distinguished road
With all due respect.....Kel-Tec and Diamondbacks and such...are all junk and should not be compared to "Tier-1" gunmakers like Ruger, Glock, S&W, Sig, Colt, Walther, H&K, etc.

If lives depend on a gun, we won't reach for Taurus, Kel-Tec, and such ilk.

Like I said, in the past (and assuming for the moment we're talking Glocks, as the model distinction here serves as a good example), people needed to make a hard choice.....do I want a small and concealable piece, but sacrifice rounds with only 6-8 rds available (model 43)....or .....do I sacrifice concealability to chase after more round-count (model 26), but the gun then doesn't conceal as well?. Decisions, decisions.

There is no doubt in my mind whatsoever, that if people can be given the best of these 2 choices.....without having to MAKE a compromise choice one-way or the other....you've got a game-changer on your hands that competiting manufacturers cannot ignore.

Sig is a good manufacturer but their stateside glitches of late are a (hopefully) temporary problem they can work out. My point is that as it pertains to Ruger, if the LC9s series is discontinued, my hope is that they see the future as pioneered by Sig's P365, and bring out a 17 oz, LC9-size gun, under 4.3" in height, that hold 10 rds....and do it without the QC drama of the early run of P365 guns. If they don't, and simply "update" the LC9s....then I hope they use a lever-style takedown without having to remove pins, and that they offer 2 mags like everyone else.
IPSC is offline  
Old May 28th, 2018, 07:22 AM   #22
 
petergunn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: ohio
Posts: 500
petergunn is on a distinguished road
Whether or not one trusts a kel-tec is really up to them and for some it may be all they can afford

my point was a small double stack 9 isnít new, what gets all the attention is the Sig name. the question continues to be is this old Sig quality or a dressed up kel-tec.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
petergunn is offline  
Old May 28th, 2018, 07:55 AM   #23
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Galivants Ferry, SC
Posts: 9
IPSC is on a distinguished road
Petergunn..... your point wasn't lost... I agree there were "others" who previously (prior to P365)...made slim, high capacity carry guns. The point I was stressing was to address the few comments made that people thought the P365 was a passing fad...how they couldn't understand all the hoopla...and then bringing up how "others" had done the same earlier, etc, etc. as support for that position.

The point I was trying to bring out was twofold--->

1.) what is new here is that a tier-1, top-brand was doing this instead of a bottom-drawer maker as before, and....

2.) To suggest don't think for a minute this is a passing fad. Once a top-brand maker like Sig stepped into the fray making a 10 rd gun that is no larger and weighs no more than the typical 6-7 rd carry 9mm.....then this changes the landscape. My point and my prediction is that this goes beyond a passing fad and all the "major" manufacturers will likely follow-suit in new designs being offered in the future. Ask yourself....all else being equal....would to purposely choose a 6-7 rd gun when the overall package size and weight is the same...but can carry 10-11 rds? The big deal here is that Sig is pioneering this among the top brands and others will likely follow suit to stay competitive.

Now....if we wish to talk P365 history and specifics....sure, Sig stubbed their toes a number of times lately, ( the P320 safe-drop problem, and now P365 with brittle firing pins, barrel peening, failure-to-go-into battery, etc, etc).....one can rightfully ask "Is Sig losing it?". Maybe this is the case with Sig,...or mybe only SIG-USA..... or maybe it's what often happens with new designs of many brand names, some teething issues that will be worked out within the first year of production.

For me, I think the LC9S has class-leading trigger quality, and I would be sad to see it go (if true). Don't know if Ruger is working up a new version of the LC9S, or if it will make a P365 clone next.....time will tell.

Cheers.

.
IPSC is offline  
Old May 28th, 2018, 05:44 PM   #24
 
mndoggie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: MN
Posts: 4,647
mndoggie is a glorious beacon of lightmndoggie is a glorious beacon of lightmndoggie is a glorious beacon of lightmndoggie is a glorious beacon of lightmndoggie is a glorious beacon of light
I have both a LC9s and a Sig P365 so my perspective is based on ownership.

I paid close to $400 for my LC9s several years ago, bought a few mags for it etc. I've been very pleased with it and it has been carried alot.

I have fired just a hair under 2400 rounds thru the LC9s with zero issues (other than my thumb interfering with the slide stop...which I have done with the new Sig).

I love the trigger on the LC9s. Its very smooth and I've measured it to be about 4.5 lbs.
The LC9s grip isn't all that great so I ended up putting the Hogue Handall rubber grip on it so it is easier to grip on a hot humid day.

I was able to get a NIB Sig about 3 weeks ago from a neighbor who bought two. His wife had a difficult time racking the slide so he sold it to me for an extremely low price (cuz I helped him out around his place (never expected to be paid anything). I had fired his P365 and knew that it would be my next purchase.

I shoot both pistols equally well.

While some are still paying close to list price for the Sig, many claim to be buying them for $475 or so. Considering that the Sig comes with two mags and night sights, that price is way better than what I paid for a LC9s which had been out on the market for almost two years when I bought one.

I have 4 Ruger pistols. I like them (well maybe not my original LCP that much). But the quality of the Sig is just better. Sig did an amazing job on the integrated Fire control unit, remove one pin and it comes out. The way it's designed, the mechanisms are shielded from much of the gunpowder residue so cleaning is a breeze.

While my Sig trigger measures 5.75 to 6.2 lbs, it is very, very smooth. I expect in another 500 rounds it will be about 5.5 lbs. I'd like it a bit less but I can live with it, it has no hard pulls or funny gritty areas that affect accuracy.

Are there problems with the P365? The Sig mag followers are very, very soft. There were noticeable dents in the mags from being loaded for a few days even before I was able to fire it. A change in plastic material fixes that. There have been a few other issues reported with the Sig like recoil/battery issues which were fixed early on. Some strikers broke which seems to be related to the MIM process and looks to be narrowed to some specific build dates and there is already an aftermarket striker available. The night sights were upgraded cuz the original ones were too fragile. There was some peening (look at the peening on SR series..mine had that and it stopped after a few hundred rounds.)

Did the LC9s have any issues? Some had feeding problems and Ruger polished the ramp. Many had sights that moved and they were pinned. There was the big issue with US mags vs Italian made mags. Some mags wouldn't seat, others were hard to release. There were broken recoil springs and a few other issues.

Very, very few firearms in the price range are perfect. At this point neither the LC9s nor the Sig P365 seem to have a perfect record.

Now as to will the P365 "kill" the LC9s?

That's gonna be hard to say. There will be a lot of people who the "apparent" price difference will be a issue. However, when a person adds the same features to an LC9s that come standard on the Sig (Night sights installed worth $125? and a second mag $40?) the price is almost the same.

In either case Sig wins with the the added capacity, better standard grip and an accessory rail. (yes I know it is a proprietary size.)

The reality is that the Ruger LC9s isn't the only firearm who's sales will be affected.

There are a lot of others in the same boat including the G43, PPS M2 and CCP, Shield 9s, XDs 9, Kahr CM & CW models, Nano and even the double stack Keltec. I've fired them all and the Sig handles better, IMO.

Here's my LC9s and P365. The Sig has the 10 round mag installed.

.
Attached Images
File Type: jpeg LC9s_SigP365.jpeg (931.0 KB, 52 views)

Last edited by mndoggie; May 28th, 2018 at 07:18 PM.
mndoggie is offline  
Old October 3rd, 2018, 10:14 AM   #25
 
Libertyrules's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Mississippi Delta
Posts: 9
Libertyrules is on a distinguished road
lc9s pro

Hi everybody! I'm an old guy living in the Mississippi Delta.

Two weeks ago I called my local Sportsman dealer, told him I wanted the new-ish lc9s pro,

and it was delivered the dealer in two days time.

The total cost was $290.00 + tax & background check charge (I'm assuming).

The lc9s-pro lost the outside safety, and the magazine disconnect, so they did listen to the criticisms.

I love my Glock 19 gen 3, but wanted a carry gun that was a little more concealable.

I have to say, I love the look and feel of the lc9s pro, and for a EDC gun, it's great.

I love shooting it, so I went ahead and bought 3 extra mags for it.

I also love my new Ruger AR15 (.556), shooting it is quite good...a little snappy, but wth, it's a conceal carry pistol.

I have a Mark 1v 22/45 Plus a Ruger 10/22, which is a bugger to find large-capacity mags for, but love shooting it.

Will they discontinue the Lc9s pro? Changes- gotta live with them, but I've got mine
Libertyrules is offline  
Old October 3rd, 2018, 10:19 AM   #26
 
Libertyrules's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Mississippi Delta
Posts: 9
Libertyrules is on a distinguished road
Ok, I see no way to edit my comments, and I screwed up somehow, so the "...a little snappy, but wth, it's a conceal carry pistol." was meant for the Lc9s pro. Sorry about that.
Libertyrules is offline  
Old October 3rd, 2018, 12:07 PM   #27
 
SafetyJoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 1,894
SafetyJoe will become famous soon enough
Sooner or later the current LC9 will get a make over. Just like the LCP did. I'm almost willing to bet the new version will look like a scaled up LCP II. As far as Ruger being forced to make a gun to compete with the Sig P365 I think their future subcompact Security 9 handgun will get close. If not maybe Ruger should come out with a " Security 365 " model.
SafetyJoe is offline  
Old November 8th, 2019, 12:18 AM   #28
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Posts: 1
gtf2859 is on a distinguished road
Just got a LC9S Pro

It's not so easy to find a LC9S Pro new anymore. I found one online and bought it. Cost me $330. I feel I over paid for it, but I wanted it. I could have found one used for $250, but I don't like buying used guns. You never know how many thousands of rounds went through one. So I get my pistol and guess what ? It's defective. The magazine release gets stuck and you have to play with it to release the magazine. I had not even fired it. Makes me think that it got passed over by many due to this, and because I didn't get to see it until after I bought it, it was my problem. Probably why it was still available. Ruger was pretty nice about it, sending me a Fedex person to pick it up and send it back. It took about 2 weeks. The repair note stated that they replaced the release spring. My question to them was how could they have sent this out from the factory like this ? What kind of quality control do they have ? And they noted that they shot the pistol 21 times to test it. And guess what ? They never cleaned it after they fired it. That was not right. After not having the pistol for 2 weeks and having to be home all day for 2 days to sign for the pistol, now I had to start cleaning it. But I do love the pistol.
gtf2859 is offline  
Old November 8th, 2019, 03:19 AM   #29
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Polk county, FL
Posts: 10
wally1 is on a distinguished road
I have sent pistols back to several manufacturers and none of them were cleaned before they were sent back. In fact, I asked Sig if I should clean my pistol before I sent it to them and they said no.
wally1 is offline  
Reply

  Ruger Forum > Pistol & Revolver Forum > Ruger Pistols

None


Search tags for this page
has ruger replaced the lc 9s
,
is ruger discontinuing the lc9s
,
lc9s
,
lc9s pro discontinued
,

ruger lc9s

,
ruger lc9s being discontinued news
,

ruger lc9s discontinued

,
ruger lc9s for sale
,
ruger lc9s prices
,
ruger lc9s pro
,

ruger lc9s pro discontinued

,
ruger lc9s stopped
Click on a term to search for related topics.

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Ruger Forum Discussions
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LC9S Pro discontinued? EmeraldCoaster Ruger Semi-Auto 5 February 25th, 2018 05:25 AM
The 9E: its discontinued Grim Ruger Pistols 76 January 5th, 2018 03:38 AM
LC 9 to be discontinued ??? Mmm1 Ruger Pistols 20 February 12th, 2013 06:03 AM
Discontinued 22/45. James6591 Ruger Rimfires 13 February 26th, 2012 10:21 PM
Discontinued jeepnik Ruger Single Action 5 January 24th, 2008 09:30 AM

Top Gun Sites Top Sites List
Powered by vBulletin 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
Copyright © 2006 - 2020 Ruger Forum. All rights reserved.
Ruger Forum is a Ruger Firearms enthusiast's forum, but it is in no way affiliated with, nor does it represent Sturm Ruger & Company Inc. of Southport, CT.