Wrangler versus Single-Six - Ruger Forum

Ruger Forum

Wrangler versus Single-Six

This is a discussion on Wrangler versus Single-Six within the Range Reports forums, part of the Firearm Forum category; Just got back from the range a few hours ago. I took my new Wrangler and my 4 5/8" blued Single-Six Liberty Model (box stock) ...


Go Back   Ruger Forum > Firearm Forum > Range Reports

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes

Old June 20th, 2019, 06:11 PM   #1
Retired Moderator & Gunsmith
 
Iowegan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: CB, IA
Posts: 15,779
Iowegan has much to be proud ofIowegan has much to be proud ofIowegan has much to be proud ofIowegan has much to be proud ofIowegan has much to be proud ofIowegan has much to be proud ofIowegan has much to be proud ofIowegan has much to be proud of

Awards Showcase

Wrangler versus Single-Six

Just got back from the range a few hours ago. I took my new Wrangler and my 4 5/8" blued Single-Six Liberty Model (box stock) for comparison. I started out by shooting one cylinder full in the Wrangler followed by one cylinder full in the Single-Six at 10 yards. I wasn't able to use a bench rest so all shots were fired with a 2-hand hold standing up unsupported.

The first thing I noticed was the sight picture …. the Single-Six has black adjustable sights and presents a better sight picture than the silver fixed sights on the Wrangler. Despite the difference, my groups were nearly identical …. about an inch with both guns at 10 yards. The Single-Six was previously adjusted for zero at 20 yards so it printed pretty close to dead center. The Wrangler printed about 1/2" low. The next thing I noticed was the "free spin" cylinder when I started to unload/reload. My Single-Six has a conventional cylinder …. no free spin, however I have free spin cylinders in several of my Blackhawks so I'm used to them and found the Wrangler was much easier to unload and reload.

Next, I moved back to 15 yards and once again, the Single-Six printed very close to the bullseye and the Wrangler printed about an inch low. I decided to try again with the Wrangler only this time I used a 12 o'clock hold and got about an inch and a half group pretty well centered on the bullseye. So far, both guns felt nearly identical. If I closed my eyes, the only significant difference in "feel" was the plastic grips on the Wrangler and wood grips on the Single-Six. The hammer on the Wrangler cocks a little stronger while trigger pull is nearly identical. Both guns seemed to weigh about the same. Even with reshaping the loading gate detent spring, I found the Wrangler's loading gate just a little stiffer than my Single-Six.

I fired a couple more sets of six at 15 yards with both guns. My groups were nearly identically sized and pretty consistent POI with both guns. I then moved back to 25 yards and tried again. Both guns were all over the place …. maybe 4" groups at best …. and it was not either of the gun's fault, it was my eyes. I moved back to 15 yards and proceeded to shoot the rest of the 100 round box of CCI mini-Mags …. 30 rounds total in the Single-Six and 70 rounds total in the Wrangler. There were no malfunction of any sort with either gun. All cartridges loaded easily and spent cases ejected easily. I fully intended to shoot a couple brands of 22 LRs but the mosquitos had a different idea. After about 30 minutes on the range, I was attacked in full force. Thanks to all the local area flooding, mosquitos are the worst they've been for decades.

When I got home, I broke out my brass cleaning rod, Hoppe's #9 solvent, and a 22 cal bore brush, followed by a couple passes with a clean white cloth patch and a drop of gun oil. Both guns cleaned up equally well … not a hint of bore fouling in either gun. The front cylinder face on the Wrangler looked like the gun had never been fired …. probably because the Wrangler's blued cylinder has a much smoother finish than my Single-Six. I even have a holster for the Single-Six that fits the Wrangler just perfect.

My conclusions ….. except for the obvious difference in grips and sights, there wasn't enough difference in feel or performance to rate the Wrangler any different than the Single-Six. My age and eyesight is definitely showing when it comes to accuracy, however I do believe I could have shot much better groups with both guns had I been able to use a bench rest. The Wrangler may not be "match grade" but it is certainly adequate for all but the most demanding shooting sports. After tinkering with the Wrangler and taking it apart to see what makes it tick, I fully expected it to shoot about the same as a Single-Six. I was not surprised or disappointed …. the Wrangler is the best $200 I've spent on a gun for many years!

Here's my 4 5/8" Single-Six Liberty model:



This is my new Wrangler:





Last edited by Iowegan; June 20th, 2019 at 06:14 PM.
Iowegan is offline  
Advertisements
Old June 20th, 2019, 08:58 PM   #2
 
Rusbukt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 489
Rusbukt is on a distinguished road
I thought long and hard about getting one. The price is right. I keep pulling out my two three screw SS's and they keep changing my mind. Thanks for the range report. I'm curious as to how long the finish will last.
Rusbukt is offline  
Old June 21st, 2019, 02:05 AM   #3
 
oldster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: ND
Posts: 2,996
oldster is on a distinguished road
Fine report and interesting comparison. I'd spend the extra $200 or so and go with the Single Six any day. Based on your experience, there may not be $200 difference in performance , but IMO, the comparison ends there; Chevy vs. Buick.
oldster is offline  
 
Old June 21st, 2019, 02:18 AM   #4
 
rmichael63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Brunswick, Ohio (20 miles south of Cleveland)
Posts: 7,372
rmichael63 is just really nicermichael63 is just really nicermichael63 is just really nicermichael63 is just really nice
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iowegan View Post
Just got back from the range a few hours ago. I took my new Wrangler and my 4 5/8" blued Single-Six Liberty Model (box stock) for comparison. I started out by shooting one cylinder full in the Wrangler followed by one cylinder full in the Single-Six at 10 yards. I wasn't able to use a bench rest so all shots were fired with a 2-hand hold standing up unsupported.

The first thing I noticed was the sight picture . the Single-Six has black adjustable sights and presents a better sight picture than the silver fixed sights on the Wrangler. Despite the difference, my groups were nearly identical . about an inch with both guns at 10 yards. The Single-Six was previously adjusted for zero at 20 yards so it printed pretty close to dead center. The Wrangler printed about 1/2" low. The next thing I noticed was the "free spin" cylinder when I started to unload/reload. My Single-Six has a conventional cylinder . no free spin, however I have free spin cylinders in several of my Blackhawks so I'm used to them and found the Wrangler was much easier to unload and reload.

Next, I moved back to 15 yards and once again, the Single-Six printed very close to the bullseye and the Wrangler printed about an inch low. I decided to try again with the Wrangler only this time I used a 12 o'clock hold and got about an inch and a half group pretty well centered on the bullseye. So far, both guns felt nearly identical. If I closed my eyes, the only significant difference in "feel" was the plastic grips on the Wrangler and wood grips on the Single-Six. The hammer on the Wrangler cocks a little stronger while trigger pull is nearly identical. Both guns seemed to weigh about the same. Even with reshaping the loading gate detent spring, I found the Wrangler's loading gate just a little stiffer than my Single-Six.

I fired a couple more sets of six at 15 yards with both guns. My groups were nearly identically sized and pretty consistent POI with both guns. I then moved back to 25 yards and tried again. Both guns were all over the place . maybe 4" groups at best . and it was not either of the gun's fault, it was my eyes. I moved back to 15 yards and proceeded to shoot the rest of the 100 round box of CCI mini-Mags . 30 rounds total in the Single-Six and 70 rounds total in the Wrangler. There were no malfunction of any sort with either gun. All cartridges loaded easily and spent cases ejected easily. I fully intended to shoot a couple brands of 22 LRs but the mosquitos had a different idea. After about 30 minutes on the range, I was attacked in full force. Thanks to all the local area flooding, mosquitos are the worst they've been for decades.

When I got home, I broke out my brass cleaning rod, Hoppe's #9 solvent, and a 22 cal bore brush, followed by a couple passes with a clean white cloth patch and a drop of gun oil. Both guns cleaned up equally well not a hint of bore fouling in either gun. The front cylinder face on the Wrangler looked like the gun had never been fired . probably because the Wrangler's blued cylinder has a much smoother finish than my Single-Six. I even have a holster for the Single-Six that fits the Wrangler just perfect.

My conclusions .. except for the obvious difference in grips and sights, there wasn't enough difference in feel or performance to rate the Wrangler any different than the Single-Six. My age and eyesight is definitely showing when it comes to accuracy, however I do believe I could have shot much better groups with both guns had I been able to use a bench rest. The Wrangler may not be "match grade" but it is certainly adequate for all but the most demanding shooting sports. After tinkering with the Wrangler and taking it apart to see what makes it tick, I fully expected it to shoot about the same as a Single-Six. I was not surprised or disappointed . the Wrangler is the best $200 I've spent on a gun for many years!

Here's my 4 5/8" Single-Six Liberty model:



This is my new Wrangler:

Great review and comparison ... Thanks

Any thought of changing out the plastic grips of the Wrangler?
rmichael63 is offline  
Old June 21st, 2019, 03:08 AM   #5
 
Amishman44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Hoosierville, USA
Posts: 5,486
Amishman44 is a glorious beacon of lightAmishman44 is a glorious beacon of lightAmishman44 is a glorious beacon of lightAmishman44 is a glorious beacon of lightAmishman44 is a glorious beacon of lightAmishman44 is a glorious beacon of light
I have a stainless 6.5" Single-Six with both Cylinders...my first revolver and one my two son's favor while shooting.
I tend to stick with older designs, at least until newer one's are 'proven'...and based on Iowegan's post, I may consider one for each of my two son's down the road!
Amishman44 is offline  
Old June 21st, 2019, 03:12 AM   #6
 
ngashooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Dawsonville Georgia
Posts: 4,104
ngashooter is a jewel in the roughngashooter is a jewel in the roughngashooter is a jewel in the rough
Great comparison with good information. Thanks for the write up. Insects can ruin a range trip. I'm still itching from chigger bites gotten sighting in my Charger. A giant hornet buzzing behind my head made shooting good groups tough indeed!
ngashooter is offline  
Old June 21st, 2019, 04:14 AM   #7
 
gwpercle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Baton Rouge, Louisiana
Posts: 2,012
gwpercle is a jewel in the roughgwpercle is a jewel in the roughgwpercle is a jewel in the rough
I wish these range reports would stop... I'm hitting 70 , don't see iron sights that well anymore and need another SA revolver like I need another child...Then I read reports like this... I actually went to Cabela's with $250 extra in my pocket , I bought two pair of hiker shorts and 3 pair socks....is that lame or what ? I resisted looking in the gun dept , I knew if they had one I would buy it...so I didn't look . The temptation is great...now I read this !
A quality short barreled six shooter priced at $200 ...why didn't you come out 10 years ago ... I had better vision , I shot a lot more...life just isn't fair and getting old sucks rocks .
Maybe I'll make another trip to Cabela's...I loved the shorts and could use another pair, then amble over to gun dept. I still have the $250 in my wallet.

I have several pairs of after market and factory grips for my Blackhawk XR3-RED frame, will they fit the Wrangler

Thanks for the range report Iowegan , it was great !
Gary

Last edited by gwpercle; June 21st, 2019 at 04:18 AM.
gwpercle is offline  
Old June 21st, 2019, 04:23 AM   #8
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Ne Georgia
Posts: 1,368
Lc45 is a jewel in the roughLc45 is a jewel in the roughLc45 is a jewel in the rough
Quote:
Originally Posted by oldster View Post
Fine report and interesting comparison. I'd spend the extra $200 or so and go with the Single Six any day. Based on your experience, there may not be $200 difference in performance , but IMO, the comparison ends there; Chevy vs. Buick.
If I could get Single Sixes for $379 it would be nice and if frogs had wings they would not bust their rump every time they jumped.
Lc45 is offline  
Old June 21st, 2019, 04:29 AM   #9
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 1,319
blackvoid will become famous soon enough
Iowegan, I have waited with "bated breath" for your range report, and I am so happy you posted it. Now, if any friends begin talking about a "first gun" for a youngster, or whatever, I can definitely recommend the Wrangler.
Thank you, sir.
blackvoid is offline  
Old June 21st, 2019, 05:05 AM   #10
Moderator
 
Waveform's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Arizona
Posts: 11,465
Waveform has much to be proud ofWaveform has much to be proud ofWaveform has much to be proud ofWaveform has much to be proud ofWaveform has much to be proud ofWaveform has much to be proud ofWaveform has much to be proud ofWaveform has much to be proud ofWaveform has much to be proud of
Nice range report and another satisfied customer. About the only thing worth noting in the negative column seems to be the stiff loading gate. I can put up with that for under 200 bucks. Thanks for sharing your initial experience at the range.
Waveform is offline  
Old June 21st, 2019, 06:13 AM   #11
 
brnwlms's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Under my tin foil hat
Posts: 2,848
brnwlms is just really nicebrnwlms is just really nicebrnwlms is just really nicebrnwlms is just really nice
Thanks for the report. Your report seems to back up the other reports I have seen, but yours is the first I have seen side by side with a single six. You guys are going to pressure me into getting one to go with my super single six hunter and single ten.

*As for the mosquitoes, get yourself a thermacell. I have had great luck with them at the range. Get one, turn it on and clip it to your belt of set it on your bench if you are using a bench.
brnwlms is online now  
Old June 21st, 2019, 06:55 AM   #12
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: Orangevale, CA
Posts: 302
bgavin is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by gwpercle View Post
I still have the $250 in my wallet.
Yeah, but you can't take it with you.

bgavin is offline  
Old June 21st, 2019, 08:20 AM   #13
Retired Moderator & Gunsmith
 
Iowegan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: CB, IA
Posts: 15,779
Iowegan has much to be proud ofIowegan has much to be proud ofIowegan has much to be proud ofIowegan has much to be proud ofIowegan has much to be proud ofIowegan has much to be proud ofIowegan has much to be proud ofIowegan has much to be proud of

Awards Showcase

rmichael63, About the grips ….. I tried a set of walnut grips that were formerly on a Blackhawk. They fit perfect but didn't improve the actual hold nor appearance, so the factory grips remain on the gun. Turns out the Wrangler's cheap black plastic grips are the same as current production grips on Single-Sixes. They feel better than the smooth walnut grips plus black grips contrast better with the silver finish than brown grips. The good news is .... any Single-Six or Blackhawk XR3-RED grips will fit the Wrangler so it allows for many options.

Waveform, Yes, the loading gate was a prior issue. I reshaped the loading gate detent spring before I took the gun to the range, which made it much easier to operate. I could have bent the loading gate spring a little more, making it even easier to operate but I was too lazy to take the gun apart again. Maybe in the future .... if opportunity arises, I'll tweak the spring a little more. Further, I filed off a few thousandths of Cerakote and steel from the loading gate's front surface because it was dragging on the cylinder preventing it from free spinning. Although I have not run into these exact issues before, it's common with all Ruger firearms to find minor discrepancies that would not prevent me from buying another Ruger.

Just a few more comments .... even though the Wrangler is nealy identical in design, holds the same, and shoots the same as a Single-Six, if the cost was the same, I'd prefer a Single-Six because I like steel frames and adjustable sights. Fact is, the cost is far from the same. A new "no frills" Single-Six will set you back way more than double the cost of a Wrangler, which makes a Wrangler an excellent "first single action" for anyone.
Iowegan is offline  
Old June 21st, 2019, 08:47 AM   #14
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: wayne nj
Posts: 29,567
bwinters is a splendid one to beholdbwinters is a splendid one to beholdbwinters is a splendid one to beholdbwinters is a splendid one to beholdbwinters is a splendid one to beholdbwinters is a splendid one to beholdbwinters is a splendid one to behold
I would get a wrangler if my eyes were better. At 62 even with strong trifocals I need adjustable sights to see the sights properly. My 3 home defense guns LL HAVE LASERS ON THEM AND i NOW SLEEP WITH MY GLASSES NEXT TOT HE BED.
bwinters is offline  
Old June 21st, 2019, 04:10 PM   #15
 
scattershot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Denver, Colorado Territory
Posts: 4,520
scattershot is a name known to allscattershot is a name known to allscattershot is a name known to allscattershot is a name known to allscattershot is a name known to allscattershot is a name known to all
Thanks for posting your impressions. One of those is definitely on my want list.
scattershot is offline  
Reply

  Ruger Forum > Firearm Forum > Range Reports

None


Search tags for this page
how muach should ruger wrangler revolvers cost
,
ruger bearcat vs wrangler
,
ruger single si or ruger wrangler
,
ruger single six vs wrangler
,
ruger wrangler
,
ruger wrangler grips
,
ruger wrangler loading gate fix
,
ruger wrangler sights
,

ruger wrangler vs single six

,
single six
,
so rugwr wranglers have wxtra cylinders
,

wrangler

Click on a term to search for related topics.

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Top Gun Sites Top Sites List
Powered by vBulletin 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
Copyright © 2006 - 2020 Ruger Forum. All rights reserved.
Ruger Forum is a Ruger Firearms enthusiast's forum, but it is in no way affiliated with, nor does it represent Sturm Ruger & Company Inc. of Southport, CT.