Mark III V Beretta U22 NeosThis is a discussion on Mark III V Beretta U22 Neos within the Ruger Rimfires forums, part of the Pistol & Revolver Forum category; i have both and they are really accurate.im not a marksman but with a round 5 3/8 plate of metal i can hit it 8 ...
 |
|
October 19th, 2012, 07:46 AM
|
#16 |
Join Date: Apr 2011 Location: west texas
Posts: 71
|
i have both and they are really accurate.im not a marksman but with a round 5 3/8 plate of metal i can hit it 8 out 0f 10 times at 16 yards with either one! if i didnt have the shakes i could do even better. but im very happy with the neos and ruger
| 
| | |
October 19th, 2012, 07:58 AM
|
#17 |
Join Date: Aug 2012 Location: Oregon
Posts: 1,006
|
I have both. They are both accurate and reliable. The NEOS is the 6" version and the Mark III is the Hunter version. I cleaned and lubed both before going to the range the first time. My wife prefers the feel of shooting the NEOS and I prefer the feel of shooting the Mark III Hunter. The NEOS was much cheaper and is much easier to disassemble and reassemble.
| |
| | |
October 19th, 2012, 08:22 AM
|
#18 |
Join Date: Nov 2011 Location: northern Wisconsin
Posts: 2,774
|
Looks aside, I much prefer the all steel construction of a Mark Standard or Target version. Few guns can match a Mark for down the road durability and longevity. My forty + year old Marks/Standards still shoot like a house on fire. My '65 Mark I could still be used for competitive shooting, right now, as is. I'm sure the Neos is a good plinker and a great value, but a Mark is the better value way down the road and it will hold its value, better.
Last edited by North country gal; October 19th, 2012 at 08:25 AM.
| 
| | |
October 21st, 2012, 01:36 PM
|
#19 |
Join Date: Jun 2012 Location: Wilson, NC
Posts: 183
|
I have a Ruger Mark III 22/45 Lite, and a good friend has a Beretta Neos.
We've shot each others guns. He's happier with his, and I'm happier with mine.
Neither is a bad choice. I happen to think that the Ruger is a better choice though...
Except I had to make some modifications to be 100% happy:
1. The Ruger really needs the magazine dis connector modification to make it enjoyable. I did mine about a month ago, and have been very satisfied since.
2. I've also replaced my magazine follower buttons with Mark I buttons. $2 each from Ruger. (part number A02502) That was a BIG improvement.
He's still shooting his Beretta Neos just like it came from the factory.
So, I paid more up front, and had to make some minor modifications to be 100% happy. He has made no modifications.
I ain't rooting for the Beretta Neos, I'm just saying that Ruger needs to wise up. A customer should not have to modify a gun to be happy with it.
Duane
| |
| | |
October 21st, 2012, 05:58 PM
|
#20 |
Join Date: Apr 2011 Location: west texas
Posts: 71
|
i agree duane,why cant ruger go ahead and do all of the mods ahead of time,i think they would really better themselves more,and there reputation.
| |
| | |
October 26th, 2012, 01:04 AM
|
#21 |
Join Date: Mar 2011 Location: KY
Posts: 299
|
I have had a Neos and it was OK. I liked the Ruger better, sold the Neos to help fund the Ruger. Like said earlier the Ruger will out last the Neos and if you do have a problem with it Ruger will take care of it, Period.
The Neos I had I had to adjust the rear sight to where it stuck over the edge of the gun, I hate that and could not cope with it. I did not give them a chance to fix it, Ruger tough that's what you get with the Ruger.
| |
| | |
October 27th, 2012, 08:22 AM
|
#22 |
Join Date: Aug 2012 Location: New York
Posts: 48
| I wonder
Wonder what Bliss bought----a year ago.  | |
| | | Search tags for this page | | beretta neos forum, beretta neos vs ruger mark iii, beretta neos vs ruger sr22, beretta u22 neos forum, beretta u22 neos vs ruger mark iii, neos vs mark iii, ruger .22 vs beretta neos, ruger mark iii vs beretta neos, ruger mark iii vs beretta neos accuracy, ruger sr22 vs beretta neos, u22 neos vs mark iii, u22 neos vs ruger | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes |  Linear Mode | |
