f> LC9 vs sr9c - Ruger Forum

Ruger Forum

LC9 vs sr9c

This is a discussion on LC9 vs sr9c within the Ruger Pistols forums, part of the Pistol & Revolver Forum category; Cant decide between the two for my CCW....

Go Back   Ruger Forum > Pistol & Revolver Forum > Ruger Pistols

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes

Old January 15th, 2012, 07:30 AM   #1
littledane's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Virginia
Posts: 14
littledane is on a distinguished road
LC9 vs sr9c

Cant decide between the two for my CCW.

littledane is offline  
Old January 15th, 2012, 07:36 AM   #2
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Nowhere , FL .
Posts: 290
Specs will become famous soon enough
LC9 allows for pocket carry. Mine is always in my Wrangled relaxed fit jeans.
Specs is offline  
Old January 15th, 2012, 07:41 AM   #3
HenryinFlorida's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 185
HenryinFlorida is on a distinguished road
I first purchased the SR9c, but found in just a bit too bulky for me. It just seemed to print too much on my large frame no matter what I wore. I liked that it had a 10+1 configuration and a 17+1 configuration, but in the end, if it doesn't feel comfortable enough, or you think it prints too much, you should go with the LC9.
I now have the LC9 and find that it is much more concealable. It sill has reasonable firepower at 7+1. With a back-up magazine you have 15 rounds.
It doesn't shoot as smooth as the SR9c, but it is very easy to keep on target.
HenryinFlorida is offline  
Old January 15th, 2012, 09:45 AM   #4
PaiN's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: CT, USA
Posts: 226
PaiN is on a distinguished road
My EDC is an SR9c...it is winter here in NE so generally concealment hasn't been an issue. I just started carrying the "c" after years of nothing but true sub-compacts(incl the LC9) the comfort of the SR9c in DH715 appendix is not to bad at all. I have had two occasions where I had go unarmed because the SR9c was too big to conceal fully. I know I'm going to need a smaller gun once the warm weather hits. I might go back to the LC9 and I'm also looking at the super small Diamond Back DB9.
Besides the ease of carry, the SR has it all over the LC. If I was ever to go back to the LC9 it would never be to replace the SR9c I'd just have it for those times I need a smaller pistol.
PaiN is offline  
Old January 15th, 2012, 10:56 AM   #5
jdavis's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,871
jdavis is just really nicejdavis is just really nicejdavis is just really nicejdavis is just really nicejdavis is just really nice
I have to agree with PaiN. The SR9c is one of the best compact 9mm pistols and works well with for CC if you wear a jacket or bulky sweater in cool weather. However, with light clothes, it does pose concealment problems due to it's bulk. Here in FL, I wear light clothes about 85% of the time so smaller is always better for comfort and concealability. When I do carry the SR9c, it is either in a Smart Carry (crotch holster) or a Kholster (IWB holster) with sport shirt untucked, a jacket, or sweater. Neither method works well for me in warmer weather. I most often carry a Kahr P380 in a DeSaints pocket holster but am considering a small 9mm as a better alternative. The Kahr CM9 and Ruger LC9 are my top choices and at similar price points.
jdavis is offline  
Old January 15th, 2012, 11:17 AM   #6
txcoastie's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 1,806
txcoastie is on a distinguished road
Ask yourself, How will I carry it? That has always worked my me. There is a CCW for every season. Why not get both.
txcoastie is offline  
Old January 15th, 2012, 11:37 AM   #7
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 861
MinnesnowtaWild is on a distinguished road
Depends if you want a gun strictly as a concealed carry gun (LC9) or if you want a gun that's a little bigger but still concealable and also is fun to shoot at the range and can work as a home defense gun.

That is why I bought the SR9c over the LC9. The LC9 in my opinion is a horrible shooter, and would only be worth it if it was strictly a carry gun. The SR9c is really fun to shoot, and it's easy to shoot. I may add an LC9 for summer carry eventually.
MinnesnowtaWild is offline  
Old January 16th, 2012, 06:35 PM   #8
SnakeChief's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 721
SnakeChief is on a distinguished road
I would recommend that you try out both guns at the range. I have had NO issues with my LC9 in terms of how well it shoots. Granted I am not trying to hit the inner ring at 25 yards. That being said, for a CC gun, if you shoot out to 25 yards you may have a problem with the local prosecutor!! Given the wide range of comments people make about this gun, either a) Ruger is hit or miss, or b) the complainers have early models and Ruger has dealt with the issue. I have read posts here where folks couldn't hit the side of the barn and had to send the gun back (I think the sights were improperly installed). Anyway, I have actually been surprised how accurate the gun is at normal SD ranges, and as I always remind myself, the capacity is the same as a true/original 1911.
SnakeChief is offline  
Old January 18th, 2012, 04:41 AM   #9
Pointblank's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Metro Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 752
Pointblank is on a distinguished road

Awards Showcase

I'm a Glock guy, but I am considering the LC9 for pocket carry.
Pointblank is offline  
Old January 18th, 2012, 07:16 AM   #10
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Kansas
Posts: 877
crracer 712 is on a distinguished road
You need to buy the SR9c first. This way it'll give you a reason to buy the LC9 second, because you WANT a smaller CCW pistol. Buying one because it needs to be bigger just doesn't sell as well as the other way around.
crracer 712 is offline  
Old January 18th, 2012, 08:17 AM   #11
soonerdude's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 69
soonerdude is on a distinguished road
I went thru trying to decide this exact thing as well. If I could I'd probably have both and probably another 10 or 12 more handguns as well ... but right now just wanted/could afford one.....so I went with the SR9C because of the trigger and it's just fun to shoot! Now I've never actually fired the LC9 but from reports it sounds like you wouldn't want to be at the range all day shooting that one unless you want sore hands the next day? I did check one out at the local shop and figured I probably wouldn't enjoy that long trigger all that much. For what it's worth I carry the SR9C and most of the time forget that I am.......it's not THAT much larger if you ask me....I guess for me it came down to...do I want to have fun carrying it and not shooting it as much? or have fun carrying it and shooting it.........A LOT??
soonerdude is offline  
Old January 18th, 2012, 09:19 AM   #12
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Kansas
Posts: 877
crracer 712 is on a distinguished road
I own both, and if I could only have ONE, it would be the SR9C. Mainly because I just enjoy shooting it more. I'd probably have to change my attire if I were to carry it, quite a bit bigger.
crracer 712 is offline  
Old January 18th, 2012, 10:12 AM   #13
TXRuger's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 217
TXRuger is on a distinguished road
I had the same question a few months ago and I went with the stainless SR9c because of its smoother trigger which is much better than the LC9's and also, I could use the 17rd mags for both the SR9c and the SR9 that I bought a couple of years ago. I might buy the LC9 in the future but that's not a high priority because the SR9c is also very concealable and also, it can use the 17rd mags if need be.
TXRuger is offline  
Old January 18th, 2012, 12:45 PM   #14
with Butter & Jelly
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Northern Carolina
Posts: 830
WhiteBreadLife is on a distinguished road
It come down to weather or not you like Salt & Vinegar or BBQ Chips? Its all preference. Get the one that gonna make you happy.
WhiteBreadLife is offline  
Old January 18th, 2012, 03:12 PM   #15
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Burbank Washington ( Southeastern Corner of the state)
Posts: 2,355
Relay225 is on a distinguished road
Started out with the SR9.....Thought it would be a good cary, till I got it home & found it was way to bulky...So back to the fun store, as they always have what I want,...Took home the SR9c ...Still a fun little gun but not exactly what I wanted, so the next day I was back at the fun store for the LC9 (which by the way I handled in the 1st place)....It is exactly what I wanted, as it slips right down in the inside pocket of my leather vest, for the biker in me...
My problem is once I purchase a Ruger it stays.....So the SR9 is still in the box unshot...the SR9c goes to the range, & I carry the little gun all the time! My Grandson is the end user of all my Ruger collection.......He's one really lucky 2 year old little man!


Shoot strait & Keep your powder dry!

Relay225 is offline  

  Ruger Forum > Pistol & Revolver Forum > Ruger Pistols

Search tags for this page

lc9 vs sr9c

ruger lc vs sr
ruger lc9 vs sr9

ruger lc9 vs sr9c

ruger lc9 vs. sr9c
ruger sr vs lc
ruger sr9c vs lc9
ruger sr9c vs lc9 for iwb carry
ruger sr9c vs ruger lc9
sr9 vs lc9
sr9c too big for ccw

sr9c vs lc9

Click on a term to search for related topics.

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Ruger Forum Discussions
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
SR9c BillStaf Ruger Pistols 36 December 18th, 2012 11:26 AM
SR9C over LC9 konupe03 Ruger Pistols 25 March 5th, 2012 08:18 PM
New SR9c rmaranda Ruger Pistols 14 January 16th, 2012 04:22 PM
SR9c pakettle Ruger Pistols 5 April 17th, 2011 06:52 PM
SR9C what a gun Tommyhof Ruger Pistols 12 April 3rd, 2011 07:48 PM

Top Gun Sites Top Sites List
Powered by vBulletin 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
Copyright © 2006 - 2017 Ruger Forum. All rights reserved.
Ruger Forum is a Ruger Firearms enthusiast's forum, but it is in no way affiliated with, nor does it represent Sturm Ruger & Company Inc. of Southport, CT.