M77This is a discussion on M77 within the Ruger Bolt Action forums, part of the Rifle & Shotgun Forum category; Hey all,
I was wanting to know some information about my m77 mark II .270, what are some peoples thoughts and opinions of this rifle? ...  |
|
March 6th, 2010, 11:42 AM
|
#1 |
Join Date: Feb 2010 Location: WV
Posts: 300
| M77
Hey all,
I was wanting to know some information about my m77 mark II .270, what are some peoples thoughts and opinions of this rifle? Ill be honest i dont know much about it, my father bought this rifle for me as my first deer rifle. I love my ruger and find it to operate smooth and find it more accurate than i am.
Thanks
|
| |
March 14th, 2010, 09:04 AM
|
#2 |
Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Minnesota
Posts: 703
|
I think you've said it all already.
I cannot think of anything that my old-model M-77R .30-06 could do better for me.
.270 is a fine deer round, too.
As long as you can shoot it accurately, you'll hopefully feel the same about yours as I do mine.
Good luck ...
|
| |
March 20th, 2010, 11:39 AM
|
#3 |
Join Date: Feb 2010 Location: Cedar Creek,Texas
Posts: 89
|
I think it to be a real classic, love the wood and checkering, bluing and more important, the fine working action and accuracy. My 1st rifle was a Ruger M77R in .243 which I let go in a stooper to get the 25-06 M77V (the heavy bbl varmint rifle they used to offer). Both were tang safety models. The 25-06 was not as accurate as my 243 sporter.... it just hit where it aimed like a laser. I have replaced the 25 with a 22-250 M77R that acts like my old 243, but I don't have as much love for it as the 243 was my go to and I don't trust the 250 a much for deer.
You may have the best caliber yet in 270 winchester, and it lends itself well to the M77 MKII. You have a winner for elk deer and lopers for sure.
Best-Mike
|
| |
March 20th, 2010, 11:54 AM
|
#4 |
Join Date: Feb 2010 Location: WV
Posts: 300
|
Thanks for the input guys
|
| |
March 20th, 2010, 03:23 PM
|
#5 |
Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: Kentucky
Posts: 183
|
I have a M77 Mk II in .270 but mine is stainless with the laminated stock. I handload and came up with a load that groups about 1" at 100 yards. The gun is probably capable of better but that's good enough for deer and the ranges I see in east & central KY.
|
| |
March 21st, 2010, 05:02 PM
|
#6 | | Freedom, Thank a VET!!!
Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: Mid-West & Ozark Mtn.
Posts: 1,625
|
It is a very good quality factory production rifle! I am pro Winchester model 70 rifles for most of my hunting but I do own several of those Rugers. Yes, they are more accurate than most of those who shoot them by far. |
| |
April 10th, 2010, 01:16 PM
|
#7 |
Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: southwest Colorado
Posts: 142
|
You're a lucky guy to have a dad like that--too many kids will never know the wonderful joy of receiving the gift of a fine hunting rifle from their father.
I have a Ruger Hawkeye in .270, and I love it.
I know you'll will enjoy it for many seasons to come.
|
| |
April 23rd, 2010, 06:05 PM
|
#8 |
Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: Central Va.
Posts: 8
|
You will cherish that rifle and pass it onto your grandchildren. Mine is as capable as ever at 34 years old. My kids have learned to appreciate the "whomp" of a .300 Win Mag. from it. |
| | | Search tags for this page | | are ruger m77 round top models more valuable, how do i know if my ruger stainless laminate brown stock is a hawkeye or a mark ii, how to tell if a m77 is a hawkeye, m77 forum, m77 hawkeye 243 accuracy reviews and forumns, old ruger m77 270 winchester with ruger laminated stock, opinions ruger 77r, ruger m77 243 varmit rifles, ruger m77 hawkeye forums, ruger m77 mark ii forum sites, ruger m77 mkii 270 rifle, ruger m77 mkii, 270, 22 | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode | |