Beretta NanoThis is a discussion on Beretta Nano within the Pistols & Revolvers forums, part of the Pistol & Revolver Forum category; Introducing the Beretta Nano - Guns & Ammo
Anyone else seen or heard of these? Looks like the PX's little cousin. I like the 92/96 ...
 |
|
August 29th, 2011, 12:20 PM
|
#1 |
Join Date: May 2011 Location: Albuquerque
Posts: 1,102
| Beretta Nano
Introducing the Beretta Nano - Guns & Ammo 
Anyone else seen or heard of these? Looks like the PX's little cousin. I like the 92/96 and other steel framed Berettas, but not really their polymer stuff. Looks like the LC9 will have some competition!
| 
| | |
August 29th, 2011, 12:49 PM
|
#2 |
Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Beretta City, Texas
Posts: 462
|
There is a TON of talk on all the forums, including the Beretta Forum.
Depending on the size it actually turns out to be, it may give the Kahr PM9 some competition.
I don't see myself buying one, as I prefer DA/SA guns, and typically with a metal frame. But, we'll see. A new gun is always a good thing
| |
| | |
August 29th, 2011, 02:15 PM
|
#3 |
Join Date: May 2011 Location: Albuquerque
Posts: 1,102
|
This is the first I've seen of it here, but not the Beretta forum, as Beretta has a factory rep who posts there. I don't think I'd buy one either, haven't been won over by the LC9 yet either.
| |
| | |
October 9th, 2011, 07:34 PM
|
#4 |
Join Date: May 2011 Location: Albuquerque
Posts: 1,102
|
There is an interesting article in the latest Guns & Ammo about the Nano. It is also on the cover and pictured actual size. From the article, it sounds like it is slowly winning me over. The things that I like on it are as follows:
1. Smooth frame. No slide release. LC9 has one.
2. No manual safety. LC9 has one.
3. No magazine disconnect safety. LC9 has one.
| |
| | |
October 9th, 2011, 07:47 PM
|
#5 |
Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: tennessee
Posts: 238
|
After the Kimber Solo, Sig's P290...it's about time. Let the comparisons begin.  | |
| | |
October 14th, 2011, 07:22 PM
|
#6 |
Join Date: Sep 2011 Location: WI
Posts: 476
|
Hey Shipwreck, long time no talk!  | |
| | |
November 22nd, 2011, 04:50 PM
|
#7 |
Join Date: Oct 2011 Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 75
|
I have owned Kahrs, and an LC9. I like the Nano better than all the rest! 
Here is a target fired from 50 feet.  | |
| | |
November 22nd, 2011, 05:11 PM
|
#8 |
Join Date: Nov 2011 Location: New Mexico
Posts: 349
|
I guess competition is a good thing but after owning a Kahr I will stick with Ruger and the LC9.
| |
| | |
November 23rd, 2011, 08:06 AM
|
#9 |
Join Date: May 2011 Location: Albuquerque
Posts: 1,102
|
Awesome! I'd love to check one out in person. The LGS that I frequent hasn't even heard of these yet, so who knows.  | |
| | |
November 23rd, 2011, 09:38 AM
|
#10 | | Previously Interested
Join Date: Oct 2011 Location: Trapped in a horde of stupid people
Posts: 4,388
|
There is a lot of discussion on the Beretta Forum about the Nano not ejecting light loads. Several new owners are not happy having to buy the bigger dollar ammo for just practice. Most of the comments are under the Beretta Handguns section, you don't have to be a member to read the site: Beretta Forum - Powered by vBulletin | |
| | |
November 23rd, 2011, 09:50 AM
|
#11 |
Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Georgia
Posts: 3,850
|
From what I have seen in pictures the Nano is bigger than the LC9. It will be interesting to hold and compare one to the other.
| |
| | |
November 23rd, 2011, 11:15 AM
|
#12 |
Join Date: May 2011 Location: Albuquerque
Posts: 1,102
|
Even if it is bigger, I'd rather have the Nano. See post number 4 for reasons why.
| |
| | |
November 23rd, 2011, 11:19 AM
|
#13 |
Join Date: May 2010 Location: nc
Posts: 328
| Quote: |
From what I have seen in pictures the Nano is bigger than the LC9...
| Ummm... Actually it's smaller than LC9... It's comparable to the Kahr PM9 and CM9 in size.
| |
| | |
November 24th, 2011, 09:47 AM
|
#14 |
Join Date: May 2011 Location: Albuquerque
Posts: 1,102
|
Looks like we need a side by side!
| |
| | |
November 24th, 2011, 10:06 AM
|
#15 |
Join Date: Oct 2011 Location: Usa
Posts: 1,056
|
Nice. Only thing I don't like is no slide lock/release
| |
| | | Search tags for this page | | beretta nano forum, beretta nano or ruger lc9, beretta nano versus kahr cm9 versus sig p290, beretta nano vs lc9, beretta nano vs ruger lc9, beretta nano vs ruger lcp, cm9 vs nano vs lc9, kahr cm9 versus beretta nano versus sig p290, ruger lc9 or beretta nano, ruger lc9 vs beretta nano, ruger lcp vs beretta nano, sig p290 vs beretta nano | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes |  Linear Mode | |
