Ruger Forum

Lc9 and rtk tactical trigger

This is a discussion on Lc9 and rtk tactical trigger within the Gunsmithing forums, part of the Firearm Forum category; I had the RTK Tactical Trigger in my LC9 for about an hour. I did not like it at all. The pull was not straight ...


Go Back   Ruger Forum > Firearm Forum > Gunsmithing

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes

Old June 30th, 2012, 07:29 PM   #1
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Sarasota, Florida
Posts: 183
robkarrob is on a distinguished road
LC9 with RTK Tactical Trigger Review

I had the RTK Tactical Trigger in my LC9 for about an hour. I did not like it at all. The pull was not straight back, but up and back. As I pulled the trigger back the RTK Trigger began moving back and upwards on a near 20 degree angle. This made the trigger pull feel very awkward. The shape and angle of the trigger caused my trigger finger to drag on the trigger guard, during the pull. Either one of these issues would have caused me to remove the RTK Trigger. It was a "no brainer" to remove the trigger with both of these problems. I was very disappointed as I was expecting an improvement with the RTK Trigger install. Watch the video at the end of this post to see what I experienced with the RTK Tactical Trigger.

I emailed Ross, the owner of RTK, and explained my position about the trigger and how it could be easily improved. He emailed me back saying he did not want anything to do with me because I "trashed his trigger in public on YouTube." I explained that I did a review on his trigger, and gave my opinion about it. I said if he improved it I would do another review and retract the negative review. Well he did not improve it. He has come out with more styles of the same trigger. They have flashy colors and fancy milling cuts, but they are all based on the original flawed design. I have nothing to gain or lose in a review. I just state my opinion, based on many years involved in Mechanical Engineering and Tool and Die Making. I have many years of working on and modifying guns.

The only trigger that I see as flawed is the RTK Tactical Trigger, which can only be used with the Galloway Precision Trigger Kit. This Tactical trigger flaw is caused mostly from the design to incorporate a trigger overtravel stop into the trigger. If you watch my video, it shows how the design could have been improved while keeping the overtravel stop in place. The rest of the RTK line of triggers should perform fine, as they are all basic style triggers.

Not only is the design of the trigger flawed, but the trigger overtravel stop has limitations with the Galloway Trigger Kit. This is not a fault of the RTK Trigger, but a fault in the Galloway Kit. I have seen posts in this "trigger pull thread" where people have bought the RTK Trigger and can't remove much overtravel. They try to set the overtravel stop to a minimum and their LC9's stop firing. The hammer drops but the firing pin does not clear the firing pin blocker. This is due to the blocker lever not rising high enough due to the overtravel stop limiting the lever's movement.

Back at the end of November 2011, after I installed only the Galloway Hammer in my LC9, I checked the blocker lever lift with the stock trigger bar still installed in my LC9. I emailed Eric Galloway to advise him I found the blocker lever was rising just high enough to allow the firing pin blocker to clear the firing pin and allow the "hit" to the primer. I found it was very close and thought it should have more built in clearance. I told him of my findings and I said that I thought some people might have a problem with this issue. Turns out some people did have a firing pin blocker problem after they installed the Galloway trigger bar with the Galloway hammer. In early December 2011, I modified the "stock" trigger bar to move the trigger break point from the back of the trigger guard to near the middle of the trigger guard. Galloway, at that time, did not have any trigger bars available. About a month later, Galloway's trigger bar eventually came on the market (mid January, 2012), with a similar design to the original trigger bar that I had made.

In mid December I installed a trigger overtravel stop on my LC9, and my gun stopped firing. The blocker lever did not raise high enough to release the firing pin blocker, as the trigger stop limited trigger overtravel and blocker lever lift. I emailed Eric about this problem and he agreed with me that the overtravel stop was limiting the lifting of the blocker lever. I later determined that this problem could be solved by notching the trigger bar tab. The notching of the trigger bar tab does not work using a Galloway trigger bar. It only works by modifying a stock LC9 trigger bar tab and using the Galloway hammer. The modification is shown in my YouTube video #7 ( Ruger LC9 Trigger Bar Modification #7 - YouTube ). By notching the trigger bar tab, I did not remove any material from the part of the tab that contacts the blocker lever. I notched only the area of the tab that contacts the hammer, to allow for the hammer reset. My gun now fires fine with ample blocker lever lift. I have cut my total trigger overtravel to less than 1/64 inch.

Those people that purchased the RTK Tactical Trigger for an overtravel stop, are not going to be able to reduce the overtravel by very much, if any. Since the Galloway Trigger Bar has .020 machined off the entire trigger bar tab, this causes the blocker lever to just rise high enough to barely allow the firing pin blocker to clear. As soon as you try to adjust the set screw out, to limit the overtravel, the blocker will not clear, no bang. Hopefully Eric Galloway has redesigned his soon to be released new trigger bars, so that the blocker lever raises high enough that a trigger overtravel stop can be used to it fullest extent.

Watch the following video which explains my complaints about the RTK Trigger. Click on the link at the top of this player. This takes you to YouTube. Then choose full screen at the bottom right of the YouTube video player:





Bob




Last edited by robkarrob; July 15th, 2012 at 10:57 AM.
robkarrob is offline  
Advertisements
Old July 29th, 2012, 07:53 AM   #2
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: texas
Posts: 1
sfzx is on a distinguished road
LC9 trigger

Bob,

You have spent considerable time on this project, with what I would consider very good insight. One question now as to which transfer bar are you using? Your modified bar with full tab and the small notch, then new hole drilled 130 thousandths back, or Eric's version? My understanding at this point is that you have Eric's modified hammer in place, is that correct. Have you looked at the RTK short stroke trigger for the LC9? If so what are your thoughts on that set up and why would they not recommend that set up with the galloway mod"s.
sfzx is offline  
Old August 3rd, 2012, 02:04 PM   #3
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Sarasota, Florida
Posts: 183
robkarrob is on a distinguished road
I am using my trigger bar/transfer bar, which has the tab notched for higher lift of the blocker lever. It has the hole drilled at .130 inch. To move the break point forward and shorten the pull length, you must use the Galloway hammer, so yes I am using the Galloway hammer. My trigger bar and Galloway's trigger bar are very similar, except for the notch. With the trigger overtravel stop, my LC9 did not get enough lift of the blocker lever for the firing pin blocker to clear the firing pin, no bang. With my original modified trigger bar (no notch) installed or with Galloway's trigger bar installed, my LC9 would not fire when using the trigger stop. When I notched the bar, it allowed the blocker lever to raise up 1/16 inch higher, and the gun fires fine now. I could have used the Galloway trigger bar or my original trigger bar (no notch) if I didn't have the trigger stop. Without the stop, the trigger continues to travel, after the break point, and the blocker lever raises high enough for the LC9 to fire.

The new RTK trigger (called "short Stroke") is not for use with the Galloway kit. It can be used in a stock LC9 or in a LC9 that only has the Galloway hammer installed, as they both break deep. If you read the fine print it states "Not recommended with short link-bar" which means the Galloway trigger bar or any trigger bar that moves the break point forward. It looks like a nice shapped trigger, fairly flat and should feel good. The trigger alone can not shorten the pull (named short stroke??). The length of trigger pull is in relation to the hammer, trigger bar, and trigger pivot design, not the trigger design.

Keep checking the Galloway Precision web site. Towards the end of September they shoud be selling the trigger kits again for the LC9. They ahve the new trigger bars in, but are waiting for the custom hammers.

Personally I would straighten out the stock trigger and not buy the ant RTK trigger. They look flashy, but are still only a trigger. Very easy project and no extra cost. Watch my trigger reshape video: Ruger LC9 Trigger Reshape and RTK Tactical Trigger Video #8 - YouTube

Bob

Last edited by robkarrob; August 3rd, 2012 at 02:13 PM.
robkarrob is offline  
Reply

  Ruger Forum > Firearm Forum > Gunsmithing



Search tags for this page
lc9 rtk short stroke trigger
,
lc9 rtk trigger
,
rtk lc9 trigger review
,
rtk short stroke
,

rtk short stroke trigger

,
rtk short stroke trigger for lc9
,
rtk short stroke trigger for the ruger lc9
,
rtk short stroke trigger lc9 review
,

rtk short stroke trigger review

,
rtk tactical trigger
,

rtk trigger

,

rtk trigger for lc9


Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Ruger Forum Discussions
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
SR9c trigger vs. SR9 trigger question ping Ruger Pistols 2 March 21st, 2011 09:56 AM
NMBH Trigger vs Bisley Trigger Nico Malo Ruger Single Action 2 February 23rd, 2011 03:47 PM
Tactical Innovations Stripped 10/22 Trigger Housing Bob Worthington Ruger 10/22 Rimfire 5 November 30th, 2010 04:11 PM
Metal trigger guard, trigger and mag release dksac2 Ruger 10/22 Rimfire 14 July 21st, 2010 03:02 PM
10/22 Tactical FLIPEXED Ruger 10/22 Rimfire 10 May 7th, 2009 03:51 PM

Top Gun Sites Top Sites List  
Powered by vBulletin 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
Copyright © 2006 - 2013 Ruger Forum. All rights reserved.
Ruger Forum is a Ruger Firearms enthusiast's forum, but it is in no way affiliated with, nor does it represent Sturm Ruger & Company Inc. of Southport, CT.