Ruger Forum

LCR vs LCP

This is a discussion on LCR vs LCP within the CCW forums, part of the Firearm Forum category; I've been seeing a lot of people buying the LCR lately, and I'm curious why people choose the LCR over the LCP. ? LCP advantages: ...


Go Back   Ruger Forum > Firearm Forum > CCW

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes

Old September 4th, 2009, 03:41 AM   #1
CARSON-WEST - 2016
 
BuckeyeBlast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: at the gun range.
Posts: 5,576
BuckeyeBlast will become famous soon enoughBuckeyeBlast will become famous soon enough
LCR vs LCP

I've been seeing a lot of people buying the LCR lately, and I'm curious why people choose the LCR over the LCP. ?

LCP advantages:
2 more rounds, easier to conceal as it's smaller and lighter, cheaper $, longer barrel (translates to better accuracy?)

LCR advantage:
.38spl vs .380



BuckeyeBlast is offline  
Advertisements
Old September 4th, 2009, 04:13 AM   #2
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Michigan
Posts: 101
Polydorus is on a distinguished road
Some people just prefer revolvers to autos. Maybe, like me, they watched too many Westerns during childhood.
Polydorus is offline  
Old September 4th, 2009, 06:15 AM   #3
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: North Colorado
Posts: 4,152
Pat-inCO will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by BuckeyeBlast
LCP advantages:
2 more rounds, easier to conceal as it's smaller and lighter, cheaper $, longer barrel (translates to better accuracy?)
Initial price may be less but the ammo for a .380 will eat you alive (around here, now, it is twice as much as .38Sp - IF you can find it).

The real accuracy difference in the barrel length is negligible.

Quote:
LCR advantage:
.38spl vs .380
Which is a LOT! If you look at the "Ballistics by the inch" that Iowegan posted, you find that the .380 in a 3" barrel is about 900fps with a 85Gr bullet. The .38Sp. with a 135Gr in a 1.8" barrel is about the same velocity (within 30 fps). That's almost 40% heavier at virtually the same velocity.

Second item is if the LCR just goes click, you just pull the trigger again.
Pat-inCO is offline  
Old September 4th, 2009, 07:04 AM   #4
CARSON-WEST - 2016
 
BuckeyeBlast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: at the gun range.
Posts: 5,576
BuckeyeBlast will become famous soon enoughBuckeyeBlast will become famous soon enough
Just wonderin' - I had this debate and decided the LCP was more suited for me, just wondering what other people were basing their choices on.
BuckeyeBlast is offline  
Old September 4th, 2009, 09:22 AM   #5
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: North Colorado
Posts: 4,152
Pat-inCO will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by BuckeyeBlast
Just wonderin' - I had this debate and decided the LCP was more suited for me, just wondering what other people were basing their choices on.
That's what it is all about. Collect information, then make your own decision.
Pat-inCO is offline  
Old September 4th, 2009, 09:27 AM   #6
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: upstate SC
Posts: 76
btg3 is on a distinguished road

Awards Showcase

When the LCP debtued, I thought I had to have it, but 2 things changed my mind:
1. Primarily, I rented a P3AT and was adamant that I wanted no handgun which was so uncomfortable to shoot.
2. I agree with those who feel that .380 ACP is a bit underpowered.

Additionally, I have a 642 that I can shoot well and comfortably with +P ammo. Reportedly, the LCR is more comfortable has won converts from the 642.

YMMV, but my leaning is strongly toward the LCR.

Best advice: SHOOT BOTH, THEN DECIDE.
btg3 is offline  
Old September 4th, 2009, 05:53 PM   #7
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 32
B-One is on a distinguished road
From a ballistic standpoint, I'll take a .38 over a .380.

In a small CQB gun I'll take the reliability of a revolver, especially a concealed hammer revolver, over an auto. Modern autos are very reliable in most circumstances, but the revolver has no slide to jam if it is obstructed by clothing, walls, body parts etc.

Revolver hides better in a pocket for me with an obvious bulge, but no obvious outline. The auto's less rounded profile seems to create a more conspicuous outline.
B-One is offline  
Old September 4th, 2009, 06:12 PM   #8
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,017
rantingredneck is on a distinguished road
I own both. Like both. Carry both. (usually not at the same time)
rantingredneck is offline  
Old September 5th, 2009, 06:26 PM   #9
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: KY, USA
Posts: 31
mitchtan is on a distinguished road
These are both great guns and can serve different roles. I own both and carry both. I have a velcro holster rig in my truck for the LCR and always keep the LCP in my pocket or IWB.
mitchtan is offline  
Old October 30th, 2009, 12:58 AM   #10
 
shooter429's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 173
shooter429 is on a distinguished road
A few points to consider, and yes, I own(ed) both.

First, I much prefer +p .38s out of a snub than a .380 out of a mousegun. The reason is obvious: Power. Look at this Heavy .38 Special +P Ammo - 158 gr. L.S.W.C.H.P. --G.C. (1,000fps/M.E. 351 ft.lbs.) versus 380 Auto +P Ammo - 90 gr. Jacketed Hollow Point (1200fps M.E. 288 ft. lbs. The difference might not seem like much, but I consider the extra weight and 75 Lbs of energy to be a big asset when such diminutive cartridges are considered.

Second is reliability. "Five for sure" is better than "7 maybe."

Third is controllability and control. The LCP and LCR both have DOA actions, but in rapid fire, the .38 is easier to hit with, IMHO.

Also, consider the ammo cost, availability and ease of obtaining quality practice ammo. Realitically, the snub is good for range sessions and the LCP, is just too small and expensive to practice a lot with. And practice is important. As a handloader, I make practice ammo for the .38 for $5 a box, versus $10 for the .380.

Then consider that you can choose an infinite number of bullets/powders/loads from which to choose without worrying about reliability. If it fits, it ships. The LCP, on the other hand is ammo dependent for reliability.

Oh and try running the LCP dirty. I keep all my autos spotless, but the revos are more forgiving of neglect. So if you go to the range and then have to carry straight away, the revo will still go bang. The auto might not funtion reliably when dirty.

The LCR has not been recalled, but the LCP has.

I could go on and on, but why. The LCR is the better tool for all but crotch carry.

Shooter429
shooter429 is offline  
Old October 30th, 2009, 04:43 AM   #11
Code Slinger
 
Keith Smith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Sugar Hill, Georgia, USA.
Posts: 2,192
Keith Smith is on a distinguished road

Awards Showcase

Depends on the application which is better. Revolvers can take more abuse and still function properly, while autos need constant care. For example, I have a SP101 that gets abused, stuffed between the mattress, thrown in the car console, stuffed in the glove box, taken mountain biking, hiking, getting soaked (from hiking and biking) etc, and I don't have to worry about dirt/grime buildup which can result in stove piping, failure to feed, etc. The only real condition that I have to worry about it the ammo's primer going bad resulting in a click instead of a bang, and if that happens, pull the trigger again, etc.

I also recommend revolvers for novice firearm owners. This is because the mechanical operation is much easier to understand, care and maintenance is minimal, and malfunctions are easier to correct. I get very nervous when I see a novice trying to clear a stove pipe on an auto, especially when the pistol had successfully chambered a round, but failed to close.

There is also the mental stimulation of shooting a large caliber revolver single action. That Click-Boom, Click-Boom excites me.

On the otherside, having more rounds has something to say too. e.g. 5 shot revolver vs a 17 rnd 9mm auto. There is a reason Police do not carry revolvers anymore.
Keith Smith is offline  
Old October 30th, 2009, 04:47 AM   #12
Code Slinger
 
Keith Smith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Sugar Hill, Georgia, USA.
Posts: 2,192
Keith Smith is on a distinguished road

Awards Showcase

Quote:
Originally Posted by shooter429 View Post
The LCR has not been recalled, but the LCP has.
It hasn't been out long enough... :P

I am seriously considering replacing my SP101 with a LCR.
Keith Smith is offline  
Old October 30th, 2009, 05:29 AM   #13
CARSON-WEST - 2016
 
BuckeyeBlast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: at the gun range.
Posts: 5,576
BuckeyeBlast will become famous soon enoughBuckeyeBlast will become famous soon enough
Good points, but I guess personal preference and application varies for everyone. My normal CC is my Glock 26. G26 has many advantages over the LCP and IMO, the only LCR vs G26 debate would be the revolver vs pistol arguement. My G26 has been more reliable than my GP100, the G26 has well more than enough accuracy for CC, and 9mm vs .38spl is extremely comperable w/ the slight edge to the 9mm. So for me, the only time I take the LCP over the G26 is when concealability is of utmost importance, and for those applications the LCP would work better than the LCR, IMO.
Like I said, for me the LCR just seemed kind of a 'why?' gun, but after reading the posts I can see why some prefer it.
BuckeyeBlast is offline  
Old October 30th, 2009, 06:22 AM   #14
Moderator
 
terry_p's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: NH, USA.
Posts: 13,196
terry_p has a spectacular aura aboutterry_p has a spectacular aura about
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith Smith View Post
I am seriously considering replacing my SP101 with a LCR.
I'm kind of at that same crossroads. I pocket carry most of the time and the SP has been a faithful friend. I have looked at the LCR and although the weight would be nice I am having trouble getting past the looks of the thing. I saw one in the display case this week next to a S&W 442 and the Smith had a lot more appeal to me and was only about $50 more (both new) and 1 1/2 oz heavier. I have found in the past when I start waffling about a new gun I don't purchase.
terry_p is offline  
Old October 30th, 2009, 06:28 AM   #15
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 1,413
Ale-8(1) is on a distinguished road
My take would be that if concealment were my primary issue, the LCP would win out, but otherwise I'd go for "more gun", ie, .38+P's over .380's.

Not a nice, clean distinction, but life ain't fair . . .

JMHO
Ale-8(1) is offline  
Reply

  Ruger Forum > Firearm Forum > CCW



Search tags for this page
lcp or lcr
,
lcp versus lcr
,

lcp vs lcr

,
lcr lcp
,
lcr or lcp
,
lcr or lcp for ccw
,

lcr vs lcp

,

ruger lcp vs lcr

,
ruger lcp vs ruger lcr
,
ruger lcr vs lcp
,
ruger lcr vs lcp review
,
ruger lcr vs ruger lcp
Click on a term to search for related topics.

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Top Gun Sites Top Sites List  
Powered by vBulletin 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1
Copyright © 2006 - 2014 Ruger Forum. All rights reserved.
Ruger Forum is a Ruger Firearms enthusiast's forum, but it is in no way affiliated with, nor does it represent Sturm Ruger & Company Inc. of Southport, CT.